Plagiarism in the Indian Literary Context: Issues and Perspectives
Abstract
Ethics in literature can be examined from different angles: an author’s writing process and how the work is received are two of them. This paper limits itself to highlighting cases of plagiarism in literary works that could be found in Indian newspapers in the past 15-20 years. Based on this, it caters to these research questions: what plagiarism in literature is, to what extent should a “new” work differ from the “old” and how influence varies from plagiarism. In the review of literature section, the paper investigates Sanskrit scholars’ view of plagiarism, the perspectives of Indian comparative literature, Devy’s point of view on originality, legal understanding of copying, and cryptomnesia. This investigation leads to the discussion and analysis section which responds to the research questions and reviews the cases stated in the introduction. The major finding is that no critic should label a work as plagiarized without meticulous study. In addition, baseless allegations could lead to defamation. The conclusion summarizes the ideas presented so far and looks forward to a comprehensive study of how the concept of “originality and plagiarism” has evolved in India. While the purpose of the paper is to invite scholars to consider different perspectives on the concept of plagiarism, this study remains relevant because critics/readers continue to charge authors of theft and this impacts the reception of a literary work.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Chellappan, K. “Comparative Indian Literature : Problems and Perspectives.” Indian Literature, vol. 30, no. 3 (119), 1987, pp. 101–08. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23337930
Das, Sisir Kumar. “Comparative Literature in India: A Historical Perspective” In Chandra Mohan (ed.) Aspects of Comparative Literature Current Approaches, New Delhi, India Publishers & Distributors, n.d., pp.1-14.
Devy, Ganesh. “Translation and Literary History: An Indian View.” https://udrc.lkouniv.ac.in/Content/DepartmentContent/SM_c30be09c-d6c7-4cd2-a95c-a81119f654eb_6.pdf
Ekici Usaklioglu, Nazli Ece. Cryptomnesia and subconscious copying. 22 Feb. 2023. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4366351
ENS. “Plagiarism Charge Against ‘Aarachar.’” The New Indian Express, 16 Oct. 2014, www.newindianexpress.com/states/kerala/2014/Oct/16/plagiarism-charge-against-aarachar-672163.html.
ET Bureau. “Chetan Bhagat Accused of Plagiarising ‘One Indian Girl’ by Bengaluru-based Author, Court Stalls Sale of No.” The Economic Times, 26 Apr. 2017, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/bengaluru-author-takes-chetan-bhagat-to-court-over-plagiarism/articleshow/58365500.cms?from=mdr
“Section 499. Defamation.” India Code: Digital Repository of Laws- A system of Laws for Communication. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/show-data?actid=AC_CEN_5_23_00037_186045_1523266765688&orderno=563
Kulkarni, V. B. “Sanskrit Writers on Plagiarism”. In Studies in Sanskrit Sahitya Shastra, Ahmedabad, Saraswati Pustak Bhandar, 1983, pp.1-19 https://www.jainfoundation.in/JAINLIBRARY/books/studies_in_sanskrit_sahitya_shastra_007023_hr6.pdf
Majumdar, Swapan. “Influence Aesthetics in Indian Context”. In Comparative Literature : Indian Dimensions, Kolkata, Papyrus, 1987 pp. 85-93
Radhakrishnan, M. G. “Literary Stars of Malayalam M.T. Vasudevan Nair, Paul Zacharia Stand Accused of Plagiarism.” India Today, 2 July 2012, www.indiatoday.in/magazine/controversy/story/20010910-literary-stars-of-malayalam-m-t-vasudevan-nair-paul-zacharia-stand-accused-of-plagiarism-774182-2001-09-09.
Sudhir, Abhishek. “Legal View: Why Anvita Bajpai’s Plagiarism Case Against Chetan Bhagat Is a Weak One.” Scroll.in, 28 Apr. 2017, https://scroll.in/article/835803/legal-view-why-anvita-bajpais-plagiarism-case-against-chetan-bhagat-is-a-weak-one
TNM Staff. “Not Just Chetan Bhagat: Three Other High-profile Allegations of Plagiarism and Fraud.” The News Minute, 27 May 2021, www.thenewsminute.com/news/not-just-chetan-bhagat-three-other-high-profile-allegations-plagiarism-and-fraud-61024.
View Counter
Abstract - 63
PDF - 36
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Smruti Swaroop

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN: 2454-2296
3.jpg)






