The Essence of the Age of Enlightenment in Emma Donoghue’s Slammerkin

shikha thakur

Abstract


This paper aims at analysing Emma Donoghue’s Slammerkin, written in 2000. This novel, set in mid-eighteenth century England, projects a girl who in no time is pushed into the category of a ‘fallen woman’ for violating the prescribed patriarchal norms and roles for women. Here the girl, Mary, is represented as a universal subject who lives in wretched condition. The scope of reclamation is dealt to facilitate lost selfhood in general and of women victims in particular. Its objective is to asseverate the wholeness of one’s identity.  Reclamation is synonymous to the redefinition of womanhood and selfhood. The victory of assertion can be felicitously traced when Mary redefines the term prostitute by combating the patriarchal society of the Enlightenment that makes her a peripheral character.

Keywords


fallen woman; patriarchy; reclamation; selfhood

Full Text:

PDF

References


WORKS CITED

Albert, Edward. History of English Literature. 5thed. New Delhi: Oxford UP, 2013. Print.

Burke, Edmund. A Vindication of Natural Society: or, a View of the Miseries and Evils Arising to Mankind from Every Species of Artificial Society. Ed. Frank N. Pagano. New York: Liberty Fund, 1756. Online Library of Liberty. Web. 26 October 2015.

Donoghue, Emma. Slammerkin. 2000. London: Virago P, 2011. Print.

Schott, Robin, ed. Feminist Interpretations of Immanuel Kant. University Park: Pennsylvania State UP, 1993. Penn State University Press. Web. 21 November 2015



View Counter


Abstract - 591
PDF - 269

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 shikha thakur

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2021 The Achievers Journal                          SUPPORT JOURNAL

ISSN: 2454-2296

E-ISSN: 2395-0897 
 
The views expressed in The Achievers Journal: Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture are not the views of the editorial board or the publisher. Neither the editorial board nor the publisher can in any way be held responsible for the views and the authenticity of the articles, reports, or research findings.